Rated 2.7 out of 5Â by 88
Rated 5 out of 5 Closer to our natural shape
The beauty of these briefs is that the front panel is wide enough not to cause the legholes to gape so much. A great relief!
March 19, 2011
Rated 1 out of 5Â by NoLongerImpressed Poor Quality, Poor Fit
I have been wearing these panties for years, and I have loved them. Just as several other reviewers have mentioned, the quality isn't what it used to be and neither is the fit. The material is cheap, the eleastic in the waistbands unravel, and the last two packages I purchased both had pairs where the seams in the crotch weren't fully sewn together. Additionally, their new "won't ride up" fit leaves the panties riding lower, making them more like the "boy shorts" panties. Personally, I don't like it. It's an awkward fit. They used to fit perfectly. And, while quality and fit have decreased, price has increased. Unless JMS decides to return to the quality and fit I absolutely loved about these panties, I'll be shopping for another brand the next time I need panties.
June 24, 2012
Rated 2 out of 5Â by Florida62 poor quality, thin fabric
Every time I re-order these panties the fabric is thinner then the last order. The waistband has gone done in quality too. Sorry to say I am very disappointed in the last order of panties. I hope the manufacturer will take notice of the poor quality reviews and go back to using better fabric .
September 1, 2012
Rated 4 out of 5Â by ThriftyInTheDesert well made but the assorted prints are garish
I like these because they are well made and comfortable. I buy the assorted because I am sick of white underwear, but the assorted I got included 3 pairs of bright solids and 2 pairs with large dots on a contrasting background. Dark jewel color solids are one thing -- giant polka dots are a whole 'nother. I would recommend the underwear, but with the caveat that apparently you're likely to get a couple of garish pairs along with the solid colors.
December 30, 2011