Rated 2.2 out of 5Â by 13
Rated 3 out of 5Â by shewhoshops Not so good
These seemed like such a good idea when I found them online, but now I'm not so sure. The fabric is feel good soft, the fit is fine, but the legs are at least 2" to short. A bit of spandex wouldn't hurt them either. The fabric is so soft it tends to roll and stretch and soon you have a wad of fabric between your legs and an obvious "welt" under your jeans. Not good! The cotton is wonderful, the concept is great it just needs some refinement. My advice would be ask a woman's opinion and not the man who, obviously designed them.
April 7, 2012
Rated 4 out of 5Â by chrissytp Good fit
The only thing I would change about these is the waistband. It would be nicer if it was fabric covered rather than just bare elastic.
June 16, 2012
Rated 1 out of 5Â by Jean2000 Do not buy these
These are absolutely horrible underwear. I received these for a gift and they stretch out and continue to stretch out until they do not even look like a pair of boy shorts anymore. The cotton knit is an extremely poor quality so it does not retain it's shape at all. I have to throw them out. My sister also purchased these and she had the exact same experience.
November 9, 2012
Rated 1 out of 5Â by JustSue Not the same comfort
I bought size 13 because of the reviews, but they do not fit as comfortable as the 11's I already wear. The leg openings are huge and the crotch is very narrow. If I pull these (briefs) up to my waist, my butt cheeks are hanging out the bottom. The material is so rough, I doubt the description as 100% cotton. The crotch is the same scratchy material as the briefs. I washed them thinking it might soften them up a little and, if anything, it made them even more scratchy. The elastic waistband is extremely irritating and scratchy and the description is "plush soft-back waistband" -- NOT.. "soft covered leg bands"---NOT. Nothing about these panties is the same quality and design as I was used to in the past from JMS
November 3, 2013